The evolution in pituitary tumour classification: a clinical perspective

in Endocrine Oncology
Authors:
Nele F LendersN Lenders, Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Darlinghurst, Australia

Search for other papers by Nele F Lenders in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Peter E EarlsP Earls, Pathology, St Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, Australia

Search for other papers by Peter E Earls in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Warrick J. InderW Inder, Diabetes and Endocrinology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Woolloongabba, 4102, Australia

Search for other papers by Warrick J. Inder in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Ann I McCormackA McCormack, Hormones and Cancer Group, Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Darlinghurst, Australia

Search for other papers by Ann I McCormack in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
View More View Less

Correspondence: Nele Lenders, Email: N.Lenders@garvan.org.au
Open access

Objective: Pituitary tumours comprise a pathologically and clinically diverse group of neoplasms. Classification frameworks have changed dramatically in the past two decades, reflecting improving understanding of tumour biology. This narrative review examines the evolution of pituitary tumour classification, from a clinical perspective.

Results: In 2004, pituitary tumours were classified as ‘typical’ or ‘atypical’, based on the presence of markers of proliferation, Ki67, mitotic count and p53. In 2017, the new WHO marked a major paradigm shift, with a new focus on lineage-based classification, determined by transcription factor and hormonal immunohistochemistry. The terms ‘typical’ and ‘atypical’ were omitted, though the importance of proliferative markers Ki67 and mitotic count were acknowledged. The recent WHO 2022 classification incorporates further refinements, specifically recognising some less common types that may represent less well differentiated tumours. Whilst ‘high risk’ tumour types have been identified, further work is still required to improve prognostication.

Conclusions: Recent WHO classifications have marked significant progress in diagnostic evaluation of pituitary tumours, though shortcomings and challenges remain for both clinicians and pathologists in managing these tumours.

 

  • Collapse
  • Expand