Objective: Pituitary tumours comprise a pathologically and clinically diverse group of neoplasms. Classification frameworks have changed dramatically in the past two decades, reflecting improving understanding of tumour biology. This narrative review examines the evolution of pituitary tumour classification, from a clinical perspective.
Results: In 2004, pituitary tumours were classified as ‘typical’ or ‘atypical’, based on the presence of markers of proliferation, Ki67, mitotic count and p53. In 2017, the new WHO marked a major paradigm shift, with a new focus on lineage-based classification, determined by transcription factor and hormonal immunohistochemistry. The terms ‘typical’ and ‘atypical’ were omitted, though the importance of proliferative markers Ki67 and mitotic count were acknowledged. The recent WHO 2022 classification incorporates further refinements, specifically recognising some less common types that may represent less well differentiated tumours. Whilst ‘high risk’ tumour types have been identified, further work is still required to improve prognostication.
Conclusions: Recent WHO classifications have marked significant progress in diagnostic evaluation of pituitary tumours, though shortcomings and challenges remain for both clinicians and pathologists in managing these tumours.
Endocrine Oncology is committed to supporting researchers in demonstrating the impact of their articles published in the journal.
As an open-access journal, Endocrine Oncology articles are immediately available to read on publication, without restriction. The two types of article metrics we measure are (i) more traditional full-text views and pdf downloads, and (ii) Altmetric data, which shows the wider impact of articles in a range of non-traditional sources, such as social media.
More information is on the Reasons to publish page.
|Feb 2021 onwards||Past Year||Past 30 Days|
|Full Text Views||65||65||34|