A rare case of bladder paraganglioma treated successfully with robotic partial cystectomy

in Endocrine Oncology
Authors:
Kalyan M Shekhda Department of Diabetes and Endocrinology, University College London Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK

Search for other papers by Kalyan M Shekhda in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7884-0403
,
Jessal M Palan Department of Diabetes and Endocrinology, Whittington Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK

Search for other papers by Jessal M Palan in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Christo B Albor Department of Diabetes and Endocrinology, Kings College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK

Search for other papers by Christo B Albor in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Simon Wan Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University College London Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK

Search for other papers by Simon Wan in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Teng-Teng Chung Department of Diabetes and Endocrinology, University College London Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK

Search for other papers by Teng-Teng Chung in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close

Correspondence should be addressed to K M Shekhda: kalyan.shekhda@nhs.net
Open access

Sign up for journal news

Summary

Bladder paragangliomas are rare extra-adrenal urological tumors that account for around 0.05% of bladder cancers. Their diagnosis is often delayed because of the rarity of these tumors. There is a risk of an intraoperative hypertensive crisis if not diagnosed or identified before surgical removal. We describe a case of a 36-year-old lady presented with a 10-year history of post-micturition palpitations and headaches. Her biochemical workup showed raised urinary normetanephrine levels and imaging showed a 123I MIBG-avid bladder mass compatible with bladder paraganglioma, although interestingly almost no tracer was picked up in 68Ga DOTATATE imaging. She was started on phenoxybenzamine to control her blood pressure prior to surgery. She underwent a successful robotic partial cystectomy with no complications. After surgery, she remained symptom-free. Bladder paragangliomas are rare neuroendocrine tumors of the bladder, which need to be diagnosed and managed effectively to avoid intraoperative and long-term complications.

Learning points

  • It is important for patients with a bladder lesion to have a comprehensive differential assessment and biochemical and radiological investigations including functional imaging.

  • Multiple imaging modalities along with what is available are useful in the assessment of bladder paraganglioma.

  • The key role of the multidisciplinary team is to plan treatment in the perioperative period for minimizing risk, especially in situations where optimal management is actively debated.

Summary

Bladder paragangliomas are rare extra-adrenal urological tumors that account for around 0.05% of bladder cancers. Their diagnosis is often delayed because of the rarity of these tumors. There is a risk of an intraoperative hypertensive crisis if not diagnosed or identified before surgical removal. We describe a case of a 36-year-old lady presented with a 10-year history of post-micturition palpitations and headaches. Her biochemical workup showed raised urinary normetanephrine levels and imaging showed a 123I MIBG-avid bladder mass compatible with bladder paraganglioma, although interestingly almost no tracer was picked up in 68Ga DOTATATE imaging. She was started on phenoxybenzamine to control her blood pressure prior to surgery. She underwent a successful robotic partial cystectomy with no complications. After surgery, she remained symptom-free. Bladder paragangliomas are rare neuroendocrine tumors of the bladder, which need to be diagnosed and managed effectively to avoid intraoperative and long-term complications.

Learning points

  • It is important for patients with a bladder lesion to have a comprehensive differential assessment and biochemical and radiological investigations including functional imaging.

  • Multiple imaging modalities along with what is available are useful in the assessment of bladder paraganglioma.

  • The key role of the multidisciplinary team is to plan treatment in the perioperative period for minimizing risk, especially in situations where optimal management is actively debated.

Background

Paragangliomas are rare neuroendocrine neoplasms that originate from extra-adrenal paraganglia of the parasympathetic and sympathetic nervous systems (Asa et al. 2018). The head and neck are common sites of origin. Abdominal sites include peri-adrenal, para-aortic and inter-aortocaval areas, and rarely, they may originate from the urinary bladder (Lawrence et al. 2004, Nölting et al. 2022, Pang et al. 2024s). Paragangliomas of the urinary bladder (PUB) are extremely rare, originating from the Organ of Zuckerkandl – a neural crest derivative within the bladder wall accounting for 0.05% of all bladder cancers and 1% of all phaeochromocytoma and paragangliomas (PPGL) (Asa et al. 2018, Pang et al. 2024, Zare et al. 2024). Because of their rarity and nonspecific symptoms, approximately 50% of patients with PUB are diagnosed only after surgical resection based on histology (Li et al. 2022). We present the case of a 36-year-old lady with no other past medical history of note who presented with symptoms post-micturition of dizziness and flushing. She was also found to be hypertensive following micturition. Subsequent investigations confirmed PUB.

Case presentation

A 36-year-old female of mixed Southeast Asian and South American background was referred to the endocrine clinic for episodic headache and hypertension while micturating. She had a 10-year history of post-micturition signs and symptoms including a rise in home-monitored blood pressure, palpitations, shortness of breath and paresthesia (described by the patient as ‘like she was running for a bus’). These symptoms were associated with thunderclap headache at onset and during micturition. Each episode would spontaneously resolve after 1–2 min. Ambulatory and regular blood pressure monitoring noted spikes in blood pressure up to 169/110 mmHg. She did not have any past medical history of note. There was no family history of pheochromocytoma or paraganglioma. She smoked occasionally, rarely drank alcohol and had two children under four years, one having been treated for acute lymphoblastic leukemia. When reviewed in the endocrine clinic, her pulse was 88 beats per minute and blood pressure 130/90 mmHg, with no other abnormalities on clinical examination.

Investigations

Her initial biochemical investigations showed raised urinary and plasma normetanephrines, with normal plasma 3-methoxy tyramine, and plasma and urinary metanephrines (Table 1). Given the abovementioned history, after discussion with the urology team, she underwent flexible cystoscopy, which revealed a suburothelial bladder mass.

Table 1

Biochemical investigations before and after surgery.

Date24/08/2023 (initial)08/09/2023 (presurgery)23/11/2023 (postsurgery)
Hb (NRR: 115–155 g/L)119
Sodium (NRR: 135–145 mmol/L)139139139
Potassium (NRR: 3.5–5.1 mmol/L4.14.34.1
Creatinine (NRR: 45–84 mmol/L)717382
Serum-adjusted calcium (NRR: 2.2–2.6 mmol/L)2.382.332.44
Serum parathyroid hormone (NRR: 1.6–6.9 pmol/L)4
Serum TSH (NRR: 0.27–4.2 mIU/L)1.1
Serum-free T4 (NRR: 12–22 pmol/L)13.3
Serum prolactin (NRR: 102–496 mIU/L)90
Alanine transaminase (NRR: 10–35 IU/L)1112
25-Hydroxyvitamin D (NRR: 25–120 nmol/L)54
Urine volume (mLs)1,194
Urinary normetadrenaline (NRR: 0–3.31 mmol/day)14.85
Urinary metadrenaline (NRR: 0–1.21 mmol/day)1.19
Plasma normetanephrines (NRR: 120–1180 pmol/L)9,4717,563564
Plasma metanephrines (NRR: 80–510 pmol/L)363254193
Plasma 3-methoxytyramine (NRR: 0–180 pmol/L)<180<180<180

Abbreviations: NRR, normal reference range; Hb, hemoglobin; TSH, thyroid-stimulating hormone.

Initial imaging was via 123I MIBG (iodine-123-metaiodobenzylguanidine) followed by MRI (magnetic resonance imaging) and SPECT-CT (single photon emission computed tomography) and 68Gallium DOTATATE (gallium-68-tetraazacyclododecane tetraacetic acid–octre-otate) PET/CT (positron emission tomography overlayed with computed tomography). The MRI of the urinary bladder revealed the 33 mm lobulated lesion (Fig. 1). This was arising from the right lateral bladder wall at the base, extending towards the bladder neck, demonstrating marked restricted diffusion and avid enhancement, representing a bladder tumor. Adjacent serpiginous signal voids reflected neo-angiogenesis. The disruption of the low-T2-signal muscularis layer inferiorly reflected muscle involvement with no obvious extravesical extension. The urinary bladder was otherwise thin-walled, with no other focal lesion. 123I MIBG SPECT-CT of the abdomen and pelvis showed an intensely avid bladder mass measuring up to 4.3 cm in size, suggestive of a bladder paraganglioma. 68Ga DOTATATE PET/CT did not reveal any avid lesions around the bladder or anywhere else in the body (Fig. 2).

Figure 1
Figure 1

Clockwise from top right: coronal and axial T2 weighted images, T1 fat suppressed post-contrast image and apparent diffusion coefficient image; this shows the soft tissue tumor arising from right inferior aspect of the bladder with a feature of high vascularity and restricted diffusion.

Citation: Endocrine Oncology 5, 1; 10.1530/EO-24-0044

Figure 2
Figure 2

123I MIBG whole-body planar scintigraphy and fused axial image at the level of the bladder mass (left and top middle); 68Ga DOTATATE whole-body PET/CT three-dimensional maximum intensity projection image and fused axial image at the level of the bladder mass (right and bottom middle). These show the bladder tumor to be showing intense uptake of 123I MIBG but little uptake of 68Ga DOTATATE. Abbreviations: 123I MIBG, iodine-123-metaiodobenzylguanidine; 68Ga DOTATATE PET/CT, tetraazacyclododecane tetraacetic acid–DPhe1-Tyr3-octreotate positron emitting tomography.

Citation: Endocrine Oncology 5, 1; 10.1530/EO-24-0044

Treatment

After input from the multidisciplinary team (MDT) from endocrinology, endocrine surgery, radiology and urology, she was started on phenoxybenzamine 10 mg twice a day (BD) for alpha-blockade, which was later titrated up to 10 mg four times a day (QDS) and then 20 mg QDS thereafter. Her symptoms improved considerably on starting medication. After further MDT discussion, robotic partial cystectomy and removal of the lesion were planned. Her peri-operative optimization with alpha-blocking agents and close hemodynamic monitoring was essential in this high-risk procedure. The general anesthetics was managed by our highly experienced pheochromocytoma anesthetist who was well rehearsed with this type of tumor. She underwent surgery with no peri- or postoperative complications.

Outcome and follow-up

Histology from samples showed a well-circumscribed 35 mm nodular piece of tumor with a solid cut surface and focal hemorrhage. The lamina propria and muscularis propria showed a well-circumscribed tumor composed of nests of cells with moderately pleomorphic vesicular nuclei, prominent nucleoli and granular cytoplasm and an intervening vascular network. The cells also showed focal spindling. No necrosis or convincing lymphovascular invasion was seen. Mitoses were scarce (up to 1 per 10 HPF). Local excision appeared complete by 1 mm at the nearest circumferential inked surgical limit. A panel of immunocytochemistry showed the cells were positive for CD56, synaptophysin and chromogranin and negative for calretinin, inhibin and melan A. S100 was positive in some of the cells and scattered sustentacular cells. The proliferation fraction with MIB1 was about 1%. The appearances and immunoprofile were consistent with paraganglioma of the bladder, stage pT2, narrowly excised. Genetic testing for a panel of genes known to cause inherited phaeochromocytoma and paraganglioma (DLST, FH, MAX, MDH2, MEN1, SDHA, SDHAF2, SDHB, SDHC, SDHD, SLC25A11, TMEM127 and VHL genes and exons 5, 7, 8, 10, 11, 13, 14, 15 and 16 of the RET gene) did not identify any pathogenic variant.

Her postoperative imaging (abdomen and pelvis MRI) showed complete resection of bladder tumor with no evidence of local recurrence. She was followed up in an endocrine and urology clinic every 6 months. Her postoperative biochemical investigations were normal including normal plasma metanephrine levels (Table 1).

Discussion

PUBs were first described by Zimmerman and coworkers in 1953 as a very rare type of bladder tumor (Zimmerman et al. 1953). Although the age of onset ranges from 7 to 81 years, most patients are diagnosed between the ages of 25 and 65 years (Li et al. 2022), with a higher incidence in women than in men (Male et al. 2019). In a recent 2022 systematic review of 177 papers (194 cases), only about half of the patients with PUB were found to have symptoms related to episodic catecholamine secretion triggered by urination, including symptomatic hypertension, dizziness and sweating (Li et al. 2022). Our patient did have such symptoms, notably episodic hypertension and sweating – indeed it was the intermittent blood pressure spikes in her ambulatory blood pressure monitoring that prompted further investigation for paraganglioma. It is worth noting that around half of the patients with PUB present with nonspecific symptoms such as hematuria and are diagnosed with PUB on tumor histology, only after surgical intervention. The 2022 systematic review has shown this compellingly (Li et al. 2022). The summary of a collection of cases (excluding those which were included in the systematic review (Li et al. 2022)) from across the globe (China (Hu et al. 2022), India (Shrivastava et al. 2020, Misgar et al. 2022), Jordan (Alkhatatbeh et al. 2020), Iran (Zare et al. 2024), Canada (Malhotra et al. 2018) and Colombia (Pérez Barón et al. 2024)) provides further examples of the various presentations leading to investigations with low sensitivity for PUB identification and thus late diagnoses (Table 2).

Table 2

Selected case reports.

ReferencePlaceAgePresentation (significant past medical history)Order of investigations before surgery (* = diagnostic)SurgeryPre-surgical alpha-blockade? (BP/arrythmogenic complications)Investigation revealing diagnosisOutcome
Hu et al. (2022)China52 FPalpitations, exhaustion, emotional agitation and urination (atrial fibrillation)(1) US

(2) CT

(3) Urine metanephrines (normal)
Partial cystectomyYes (labile BP intraoperatively)Unclear. Histology not reportedResolution of symptoms. No recurrence after 6 months
Misgar et al. (2022)India52 FPalpitations, headache, dizziness, pallor and symptoms associated with micturition(1) US

(2) *Urine metanephrines

(3) MRI
Subtotal cystectomyYes (single episode of atrial flutter as inpatient prior to surgery)Urine metanephrinesResolution of symptoms. No recurrence
Shrivastava et al. (2020)India55 FDysuria and abdo pain(1) US

(2) CT

(3) *Cystoscopy & biopsy
Partial cystectomyYes (no complications)Histology of biopsy from cystoscopyNot specified
Alkhatatbeh et al. (2020)Jordan62 MObstructive urinary symptoms, poor stream, hesitancy and straining(1) US

(2) CT

(3) MRI

(4) Cystoscopy
(1) TURBT (histology mistakenly showed transitional cell carcinoma)

(2) TURBT (histology then revealed paraganglioma)

(3) TURBT
Yes, but only for third operation (labile BP during first and second operations, but no complications for third operation)Histology of tissue from second operationResolution of symptoms. No recurrence
Zare et al. (2024)Iran37 MPostmicturition palpitation, headache and sweating(1) US

(2) CT

(3) Serum & urine catecholamine

(normal)

(4) Cystoscopy
Surgery (not specified)Yes (not specified whether there were complications)Histology after surgeryNot specified
Malhotra et al. (2018)Canada12 MGross hematuria and vomiting acutely

1-year history position induced headaches, polyuria, polydipsia, nocturia and lethargy
(1) US

(2) *Cystoscopy + biopsy

(3) 18F-FDG PET (uptake at tumor site)
Partial cystectomyYes (not specified whether there were complications)Histology of biopsy from cystoscopy (noted labile BP during cystoscopy)

SDHB mutation identified postsurgically
Recurrence 3 years postresection, bladder wall and inguinal canal

Had been monitored with urine metanephrines. Further surgery and continued monitoring
Pérez Barón et al. (2024)Colombia27 MHematuria and vertigo (hypertension)(1) *Urine metanephrines

(2) CT
Laparoscopic partial cystectomy and robotic-assisted lymphadenectomyNot specified whether alpha-blockade used (not specified whether there were complications)Urine metanephrinesNot specified
Matsuzawa et al. (2022)Japan64 MWeight loss with (hypertension and arrythmia)(1) CT

(2) MRI

(3) Cystoscopy

(4) 18F-FDG PET/CT

(4) EUS-FNA.
Laparotomy: total cystectomy and anterior resection of the rectumNo (labile BP intra-operatively)On histology postsurgically

Biopsy from EUS-FNA histology suggested GIST tumor
No tumor recurrence at 7-month follow-up

Abbreviations: BP, blood pressure; TURBT, trans-urethral resection of bladder tumor; US, ultrasound; CT, computed tomography; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; 18F-FDG PET, fludeoxyglucose 18 positron emission tomography; EUS-FNA, endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration.

PUBs can be diagnosed, localized and metastases screened for, based on various imaging modalities. Ultrasound scans of the urinary system can show the hypervascular nature of these tumors mostly located along the anterior or posterior bladder wall (Malhotra et al. 2018, Zare et al. 2024). Contrast-enhanced computed tomography has a sensitivity of 91% and can show hyperdense rounded, homogeneous lesions alongside enhancement in the arterial phase with perilesional neovascularization. Although necrosis is rare, about 10% of the cases have calcification (Pérez Barón et al. 2024). MRI is more sensitive than CT and is an excellent imaging modality for tumor localization within bladder wall layers. They typically appear hyperintense on T2 and T1 weighted images, compared with the muscularis propria. Diffusion restriction can be observed, and larger tumors may exhibit a ‘salt and pepper’ appearance (Qin et al. 2020, Matsuzawa et al. 2022, Withey et al. 2022, Pérez Barón et al. 2024). Recently, functional imaging has gained significant interest in the management of patients with PPGL. These include 123I MIBG, 18F-FDG PET/CT (fludeoxyglucose 18) and 18F-DOPA PET/CT (6-[18F]-L-fluoro-L-3, 4-dihydroxyphenylalanine) and 68Ga DOTATATE PET/CT scans. Although 123I MIBG imaging is useful in the functional assessment of PPGL with high sensitivity (83–100%) and high specificity (98–100%) in detecting pheochromocytoma, its sensitivity has been downgraded in recent comparative studies, especially in metastatic pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma (mPPGL), SDHx (succinate dehydrogenate) PPGL (particularly SDHB), small tumor and mPPGLs and head and neck paragangliomas (HNPGLs) (Timmers et al. 2024). This is because, more aggressive tumors (e.g., fast-growing tumors) or metastatic lesions have a lower expression of tumor cell membrane transporter systems (Timmers et al. 2024). 123I MIBG has largely been replaced by 68Ga DOTATATE imaging, which is found to be more sensitive than other tracers in any SDHx PPGLs, mPPGLs and sporadic or hereditary HNPGLs with the lesion-based location rate approaching 100%. Despite comparative studies still lacking, it was suggested to be less sensitive for abdominal PPGLs (Gild et al. 2018). 18F-DOPA PET/CT has a sensitivity approaching 100% and a high specificity of >95% for the detection of PPGLs but it is substantially lower in metastatic tumors (Timmers et al. 2024). It has more specificity in detecting PCC, given it relies on low to moderate tracer uptake by healthy adrenal glands compared with other tracers. The main disadvantage of this tracer is that it is not approved or routinely available in most countries (Timmers et al. 2024). 18F-DOPA PET/CT is less specific for the detection of these tumors as it reflects the glucose uptake and its metabolism by the cells. However, it is useful in differentiating PPGLs from other cancers such as transitional cell carcinoma and lymphoma (Timmers et al. 2024). In addition to 123I MIBG-avid and 68Ga DOTATATE non-avid bladder mass, our patient’s genetic testing for SDHx mutation did not reveal any pathogenic variant and she did not have metastatic disease, which may suggest that she might have better prognosis than other patients who carry the pathogenic variant and/or has metastatic disease. Multiple imaging modalities including functional imaging along with what is available is useful in the assessment of these tumors.

The nonspecific nature of these patients’ symptoms results in misdiagnosis leading to the omission of alpha-blockade before surgery. This may put them at risk of developing complications related to surgery. Indeed, in one case series of patients with PUBs, of 20 patients, only two underwent alpha-blockade prior to surgery (Cai et al. 2022). Interestingly, this was despite eight of the patients having preoperative diagnoses of PUB. Moreover, in the 2022 systematic review of 194 cases, only 53% of those diagnosed before surgery had alpha-blockade (Li et al. 2022). The evidence for alpha-blockade has been debated (Groeben et al. 2017, 2020, Cai et al. 2022, Van Den Heede et al. 2022); however, given the potential risks, it is advisable that any patients presenting with nonspecific symptoms and a bladder tumor are discussed within a multidisciplinary meeting and that decisions for preoperative preparation and perioperative management are made jointly. The most recent guidance from the Endocrine Society advocates for preoperative alpha-blockade (Lenders et al. 2014). Perhaps most importantly, the correct diagnosis should be sought early to optimize management with expert consultation; as such, when there is any suspicion of PUB, plasma or urinary metanephrines must be measured before any surgical intervention. The consequences of misdiagnoses is well illustrated in the case from Jordan (Alkhatatbeh et al. 2020) where a patient had to endure three trans-urethral surgical interventions before the completion of treatment (see Table 2). Biochemical workup was only done after histology from the second operation’s sample, despite a hypertensive crisis during the first operation.

Surgical removal of the tumor is the mainstay of treatment in PUBs; however, it requires careful planning via MDTs for various reasons as discussed above. The diagnosis of PUBs can be difficult because of the overlap of symptoms and imaging characteristics with other urinary conditions such as urothelial carcinoma (Male et al. 2019, Zare et al. 2024). If patients are not diagnosed and managed with alpha-blockade before surgery, there is a significant risk of intraoperative catecholamine crisis and postoperative complications (Lenders et al. 2014, Li et al. 2022). A recent multicentric study showed only one-third of patients with PUB were diagnosed before surgical intervention, reflecting the need for better diagnostic strategies to prevent intra-/postoperative complications (Yu et al. 2022). Partial cystectomy was successfully performed in our patient without any intraoperative or postoperative complication as she was managed under MDT care, with considerable preoperative planning and adequate alpha-blockage before surgery.

Although data on genetic characteristics in PUB are limited, there are few studies that have examined the characteristics of germline mutations in this cohort (Lawrence et al. 2004, Park et al. 2017, Srirangalingam et al. 2017, Yu et al. 2022). Although our patient’s genetic testing results came back as negative, around 40–63% of patients with PUB carry a germline mutation and most commonly the SDHB subunit gene, which requires them to be followed up lifelong because of the increased risk of developing metastatic disease (Withey et al. 2022). The importance of monitoring in such cases with SDHB mutations is clearly exemplified in the case from Canada (Malhotra et al. 2018). The patient was monitored with serial urinary metanephrines and was found to have a recurrence just three years later (Table 2). In our case, immunohistochemistry for the SDHB protein in histology was not carried out, but it can be very useful in settings where genetic testing is not available/or limited because of other factors. If the histology sample shows strong SDHB protein staining, then the patient is unlikely to carry the germline mutant SDHB gene (Park et al. 2017). PUB can also be a part of genetic syndrome such as multiple endocrine neoplasia 1 (MEN-1), Von Hipple–Lindau syndrome (VHL) and Carney–Stratakis syndrome (Shi et al. 2022).

In conclusion, this case report highlights the importance of considering PUB as a differential diagnosis in patients presenting with post-micturition symptoms and paroxysmal hypertension. Consideration should be given to preoperative medical management with alpha blockers to reduce the risk of intraoperative catecholamine crisis and favorable clinical outcomes after during and after surgery. A comprehensive approach should be taken for imaging techniques with regards to localization and screening of metastases as no medium has full sensitivity. Furthermore, this case underlines the need for a multidisciplinary approach to such cases, including team input from endocrinology, radiology, nuclear medicine, general surgery, urology, pathology and biochemistry in the evaluation, management and future follow-up of such rare and complex cases.

Declaration of interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of the work.

Funding

This work did not receive any specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sector.

Patient consent

Written consent from the patient was obtained to use anonymized images and to publish the case.

Author contributions

KMS, JMP and CBA drafted the initial manuscript, reviewed the literature, gathered data and obtained consent from the patient. MW gathered images and reviewed and edited the manuscript. TTC reviewed and edited the manuscript and supervised the study. All authors reviewed, revised and finalized the manuscript.

References

  • Alkhatatbeh H, Alzaghari D, Alharahsheh S, et al. 2020 Urinary bladder pheochromocytoma managed with TURBT. Case report and review of literature. Urol Case Rep 33 101291. (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eucr.2020.101291)

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Asa S, Ezzat S & Mete O 2018 The diagnosis and clinical significance of paragangliomas in unusual locations. J Clin Med 7 280. (https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm7090280)

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Cai T, Lu J, Lin Z, et al. 2022 Bladder paraganglioma: basic characteristics and new perspectives on perioperative management. World J Urol 40 28072816. (https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-022-04166-1)

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Gild ML, Naik N, Hoang J, et al. 2018 Role of DOTATATE – PET/CT in preoperative assessment of phaeochromocytoma and paragangliomas. Clin Endocrinol 89 139147. (https://doi.org/10.1111/cen.13737)

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Groeben H, Nottebaum BJ, Alesina PF, et al. 2017 Perioperative α-receptor blockade in phaeochromocytoma surgery: an observational case series. Br J Anaesth 118 182189. (https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/aew392)

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Groeben H, Walz MK, Nottebaum BJ, et al. 2020 International multicentre review of perioperative management and outcome for catecholamine-producing tumours. Br J Surg 107 e170e178. (https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.11378)

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Van Den Heede K, Paspala A, Chander N, et al. 2022 To block, or not to block … is it still the question? Effectiveness of alpha- and beta-blockade in phaeochromocytoma surgery: an institutional analysis. Ann R Coll Surgeons Engl 104 138143. (https://doi.org/10.1308/rcsann.2021.0133)

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hu L-L, Guo Z-Q, Dai P, et al. 2022 Case report: partial cystectomy for pheochromocytoma of the urinary bladder: a case report and review of literature. Front Cardiovasc Med 9 1092260. (https://doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2022.1092260)

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lawrence J, Maher E, Sheaves R, et al. 2004 Familial paraganglioma: a novel presentation of a case and response to therapy with radiolabelled MIBG. Hormones 3 127131. (https://doi.org/10.14310/horm.2002.11121)

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lenders JWM, Duh Q-Y, Eisenhofer G, et al. 2014 Pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma: an endocrine society clinical practice guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 99 19151942. (https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2014-1498)

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Li M, Xu X, Bechmann N, et al. 2022 Differences in clinical presentation and management between pre- and postsurgical diagnoses of urinary bladder paraganglioma: is there clinical relevance? A systematic review. World J Urol 40 385390. (https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-021-03851-x)

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Male M, Ye T, Tao J, et al. 2019 Differentiating nonfunctional paraganglioma of the bladder from urothelial carcinoma of the bladder: pitfalls and breakthroughs. Biomed Res Int 2019 1097149. (https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/1097149)

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Malhotra AK, Yan R, Tabeshi R, et al. 2018 Case — bladder paraganglioma in a pediatric patient. Can Urol Assoc J 12 E260E264. (https://doi.org/10.5489/cuaj.4937)

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Matsuzawa N, Nishikawa T, Ohno R, et al. 2022 Paraganglioma of the urinary bladder initially diagnosed as gastrointestinal stromal tumor requiring combined resection of the rectum: a case report. World J Surg Oncol 20 185. (https://doi.org/10.1186/s12957-022-02662-7)

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Misgar RA, Baba MS, Bhat AH, et al. 2022 A giant urinary bladder paraganglioma. Turkish J Endocrinol Metab 26 100102. (https://doi.org/10.5152/tjem.2022.22054)

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Nölting S, Bechmann N, Taieb D, et al. 2022 Personalized management of pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma. Endocr Rev 43 199239. (https://doi.org/10.1210/endrev/bnab019)

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Pang Y, Zhang J, Jiang J, et al. 2024 Diagnosis and management of urinary bladder paragangliomas: a Sino‐American‐European retrospective observational study. Clin Endocrinol 101 234242. (https://doi.org/10.1111/cen.15058)

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Park S, Kang SY, Kwon GY, et al. 2017 Clinicopathologic characteristics and mutational status of succinate dehydrogenase genes in paraganglioma of the urinary bladder: a multi-institutional Korean study. Arch Pathol Lab Med 141 671677. (https://doi.org/10.5858/arpa.2016-0403-OA)

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Pérez Barón L, Guerrero Acosta N, Granados González G, et al. 2024 Bladder paraganglioma: case report and review of the literature. Radiol Case Rep 19 213217. (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radcr.2023.10.021)

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Qin J, Zhou G & Chen X 2020 Imaging manifestations of bladder paraganglioma. Ann Palliat Med 9 346351. (https://doi.org/10.21037/apm.2020.03.09)

  • Shi Y, Ding L, Mo C, et al. 2022 Bladder paraganglioma, gastrointestinal stromal tumor, and SDHB germline mutation in a patient with Carney-Stratakis syndrome: a case report and literature review. Front Oncol 12. (https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.1030092)

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Shrivastava R, Gandhi J & Banker A 2020 Urinary Bladder Paraganglioma – a case report and review of literature. Int J Med Rev Case Rep 1 1. (https://doi.org/10.5455/IJMRCR.Urinary-Bladder-Paraganglioma)

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Srirangalingam U, Banerjee A, Patki P, et al. 2017 Succinate dehydrogenase B (SDHB)-associated bladder paragangliomas. Clin Genitourin Cancer 15 e131e136. (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clgc.2016.06.006)

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Timmers HJLM, Taïeb D, Pacak K, et al. 2024 Imaging of pheochromocytomas and paragangliomas. Endocr Rev 45 414434. (https://doi.org/10.1210/endrev/bnae001)

  • Withey SJ, Christodoulou D, Prezzi D, et al. 2022 Bladder paragangliomas: a pictorial review. Abdom Radiol 47 14141424. (https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-022-03443-2)

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Yu K, Ebbehøj AL, Obeid H, et al. 2022 Presentation, management, and outcomes of urinary bladder paraganglioma: results from a multicenter study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 107 28112821. (https://doi.org/10.1210/clinem/dgac427)

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Zare A, Bighamian M, Moloudi F, et al. 2024 Bladder paraganglioma presenting as post-micturition palpitations: a case report. Case Rep Oncol 17 484489. (https://doi.org/10.1159/000538073)

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Zimmerman IJ, Biron RE & MacMahon HE 1953 Pheochromocytoma of the urinary bladder. New Engl J Med 249 2526. (https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM195307022490106)

 

  • Collapse
  • Expand
  • Figure 1

    Clockwise from top right: coronal and axial T2 weighted images, T1 fat suppressed post-contrast image and apparent diffusion coefficient image; this shows the soft tissue tumor arising from right inferior aspect of the bladder with a feature of high vascularity and restricted diffusion.

  • Figure 2

    123I MIBG whole-body planar scintigraphy and fused axial image at the level of the bladder mass (left and top middle); 68Ga DOTATATE whole-body PET/CT three-dimensional maximum intensity projection image and fused axial image at the level of the bladder mass (right and bottom middle). These show the bladder tumor to be showing intense uptake of 123I MIBG but little uptake of 68Ga DOTATATE. Abbreviations: 123I MIBG, iodine-123-metaiodobenzylguanidine; 68Ga DOTATATE PET/CT, tetraazacyclododecane tetraacetic acid–DPhe1-Tyr3-octreotate positron emitting tomography.

  • Alkhatatbeh H, Alzaghari D, Alharahsheh S, et al. 2020 Urinary bladder pheochromocytoma managed with TURBT. Case report and review of literature. Urol Case Rep 33 101291. (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eucr.2020.101291)

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Asa S, Ezzat S & Mete O 2018 The diagnosis and clinical significance of paragangliomas in unusual locations. J Clin Med 7 280. (https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm7090280)

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Cai T, Lu J, Lin Z, et al. 2022 Bladder paraganglioma: basic characteristics and new perspectives on perioperative management. World J Urol 40 28072816. (https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-022-04166-1)

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Gild ML, Naik N, Hoang J, et al. 2018 Role of DOTATATE – PET/CT in preoperative assessment of phaeochromocytoma and paragangliomas. Clin Endocrinol 89 139147. (https://doi.org/10.1111/cen.13737)

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Groeben H, Nottebaum BJ, Alesina PF, et al. 2017 Perioperative α-receptor blockade in phaeochromocytoma surgery: an observational case series. Br J Anaesth 118 182189. (https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/aew392)

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Groeben H, Walz MK, Nottebaum BJ, et al. 2020 International multicentre review of perioperative management and outcome for catecholamine-producing tumours. Br J Surg 107 e170e178. (https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.11378)

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Van Den Heede K, Paspala A, Chander N, et al. 2022 To block, or not to block … is it still the question? Effectiveness of alpha- and beta-blockade in phaeochromocytoma surgery: an institutional analysis. Ann R Coll Surgeons Engl 104 138143. (https://doi.org/10.1308/rcsann.2021.0133)

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hu L-L, Guo Z-Q, Dai P, et al. 2022 Case report: partial cystectomy for pheochromocytoma of the urinary bladder: a case report and review of literature. Front Cardiovasc Med 9 1092260. (https://doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2022.1092260)

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lawrence J, Maher E, Sheaves R, et al. 2004 Familial paraganglioma: a novel presentation of a case and response to therapy with radiolabelled MIBG. Hormones 3 127131. (https://doi.org/10.14310/horm.2002.11121)

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lenders JWM, Duh Q-Y, Eisenhofer G, et al. 2014 Pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma: an endocrine society clinical practice guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 99 19151942. (https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2014-1498)

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Li M, Xu X, Bechmann N, et al. 2022 Differences in clinical presentation and management between pre- and postsurgical diagnoses of urinary bladder paraganglioma: is there clinical relevance? A systematic review. World J Urol 40 385390. (https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-021-03851-x)

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Male M, Ye T, Tao J, et al. 2019 Differentiating nonfunctional paraganglioma of the bladder from urothelial carcinoma of the bladder: pitfalls and breakthroughs. Biomed Res Int 2019 1097149. (https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/1097149)

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Malhotra AK, Yan R, Tabeshi R, et al. 2018 Case — bladder paraganglioma in a pediatric patient. Can Urol Assoc J 12 E260E264. (https://doi.org/10.5489/cuaj.4937)

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Matsuzawa N, Nishikawa T, Ohno R, et al. 2022 Paraganglioma of the urinary bladder initially diagnosed as gastrointestinal stromal tumor requiring combined resection of the rectum: a case report. World J Surg Oncol 20 185. (https://doi.org/10.1186/s12957-022-02662-7)

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Misgar RA, Baba MS, Bhat AH, et al. 2022 A giant urinary bladder paraganglioma. Turkish J Endocrinol Metab 26 100102. (https://doi.org/10.5152/tjem.2022.22054)

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Nölting S, Bechmann N, Taieb D, et al. 2022 Personalized management of pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma. Endocr Rev 43 199239. (https://doi.org/10.1210/endrev/bnab019)

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Pang Y, Zhang J, Jiang J, et al. 2024 Diagnosis and management of urinary bladder paragangliomas: a Sino‐American‐European retrospective observational study. Clin Endocrinol 101 234242. (https://doi.org/10.1111/cen.15058)

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Park S, Kang SY, Kwon GY, et al. 2017 Clinicopathologic characteristics and mutational status of succinate dehydrogenase genes in paraganglioma of the urinary bladder: a multi-institutional Korean study. Arch Pathol Lab Med 141 671677. (https://doi.org/10.5858/arpa.2016-0403-OA)

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Pérez Barón L, Guerrero Acosta N, Granados González G, et al. 2024 Bladder paraganglioma: case report and review of the literature. Radiol Case Rep 19 213217. (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radcr.2023.10.021)

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Qin J, Zhou G & Chen X 2020 Imaging manifestations of bladder paraganglioma. Ann Palliat Med 9 346351. (https://doi.org/10.21037/apm.2020.03.09)

  • Shi Y, Ding L, Mo C, et al. 2022 Bladder paraganglioma, gastrointestinal stromal tumor, and SDHB germline mutation in a patient with Carney-Stratakis syndrome: a case report and literature review. Front Oncol 12. (https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.1030092)

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Shrivastava R, Gandhi J & Banker A 2020 Urinary Bladder Paraganglioma – a case report and review of literature. Int J Med Rev Case Rep 1 1. (https://doi.org/10.5455/IJMRCR.Urinary-Bladder-Paraganglioma)

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Srirangalingam U, Banerjee A, Patki P, et al. 2017 Succinate dehydrogenase B (SDHB)-associated bladder paragangliomas. Clin Genitourin Cancer 15 e131e136. (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clgc.2016.06.006)

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Timmers HJLM, Taïeb D, Pacak K, et al. 2024 Imaging of pheochromocytomas and paragangliomas. Endocr Rev 45 414434. (https://doi.org/10.1210/endrev/bnae001)

  • Withey SJ, Christodoulou D, Prezzi D, et al. 2022 Bladder paragangliomas: a pictorial review. Abdom Radiol 47 14141424. (https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-022-03443-2)

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Yu K, Ebbehøj AL, Obeid H, et al. 2022 Presentation, management, and outcomes of urinary bladder paraganglioma: results from a multicenter study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 107 28112821. (https://doi.org/10.1210/clinem/dgac427)

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Zare A, Bighamian M, Moloudi F, et al. 2024 Bladder paraganglioma presenting as post-micturition palpitations: a case report. Case Rep Oncol 17 484489. (https://doi.org/10.1159/000538073)

    • PubMed
    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Zimmerman IJ, Biron RE & MacMahon HE 1953 Pheochromocytoma of the urinary bladder. New Engl J Med 249 2526. (https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM195307022490106)